The Ontology of Covid-19 Vaccine Deception: ACOG, ABOG, and SMFM and the Future of the Human Genome – Are They Playing with Fire?
A recent research study published on Jan. 31, 2024 by the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology indicates that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is not, in fact, localized to the injection site, but rather can spread systematically to the placenta and fetal blood. For context, the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics and gynecology. Popularly called the “Gray Journal,” AJOG is considered by most to be the pinnacle of journals in the specialty of Ob/Gyn. Since 1920, AJOG has existed as a continuation of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children, which began publishing in 1868.
This most recent research study published by AJOG on Jan. 31, 2024, entitled Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses postvaccination, found that COVID-19 vaccine mRNA was detected in the placentas of two pregnant mothers who had been vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine shortly before delivery. The study also found that spike protein expression was detected in the placental tissue of the earlier-in-time vaccinated mother, demonstrating bioactivity of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA after reaching the placenta.
Also of great concern, vaccine mRNA was detected in the fetal blood of the only patient sampled, documenting a 100% rate of transmission in their study. The implications of these research findings are profound – they indicate that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines penetrate the fetal-placental barrier and reach the intrauterine environment, where the mRNA can then be translated into spike protein and expressed in the placental tissue.
Shockingly, the now documented transplacental transmission of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA does not appear to alarm the pro-vaccine New York research group, whose study was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), which is one of the institutes of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This is ironic, given that transplacental delivery of the mRNA vaccines was previously debunked as false and derided as “misinformation” in 2021.
For example, in August of 2021, the fact-checking organization AFP accused Dr. Ryan Cole of spreading misinformation and called his claims false when he asserted in a social media post that, after receiving a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, “the spike protein doesn’t just stay in the deltoid, the spike circulates in your blood and lands in multiple organs.” New York based news organization The Associated Press also ran a fact-checking piece in June of 2021, calling the claim that the mRNA “vaccines don’t stay in the shoulder muscle” false, and instead alleging that the vaccines are “mostly concentrated at the site of the injection.”
Notably, The Associated Press, which is listed as a nonprofit business entity located in New York, received millions of dollars from the federal government over the course of the pandemic, raising valid questions about whether it operated as a US government actor. In sum, those pushing the mRNA vaccines globally seemed initially intent on denying the plausibility of systematic biodistribution of the mRNA throughout the body.
The Chameleon of “Science” in a COVID World: Transplacental Transmission of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Initially Debunked in UCSF 2022 Study, Only to be Later Proven True in 2024
Perhaps fueled by so-called “misinformation” claims that the COVID-19 mRNA could be distributed throughout the body, and perhaps pressured to quell such concerns, authors from University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the San Francisco J. Gladstone Institute assessed the possibility of systematic biodistribution in pregnancy in an earlier 2022 study. Entitled Evaluation of transplacental transfer of mRNA vaccine products and functional antibodies during pregnancy and infancy, this study, published July 30, 2022 in Nature Communications, looked for transplacental transfer of mRNA vaccines products and SARS-Cov-2 antibodies in a cohort of twenty vaccinated mothers during pregnancy. But the study authors claimed to have found no evidence that that mRNA vaccine products were distributed to the maternal blood, placenta tissue, or fetal blood. The study authors concluded that while transplacental transfer of protective antibodies can occur, products of mRNA vaccines are not transferred to the fetus during pregnancy.
Notably, UCSF and the J. Gladstone Institute (institutions associated with the study authors) have been long-standing recipients of federal money, having received tens of millions of federal dollars, and in the case of UCSF, hundreds of millions of federal dollars. In fact, UCSF proudly boasts on its website that UCSF has received more funding from the NIH than any other public university for 17 years in a row. Perhaps it is no surprise that they attempted to weigh in early, in what would temporarily squelch concerns that transplacental transmission of mRNA vaccines was not only plausible but actually occurring.
Importantly, the UCSF and J. Gladstone Institute author conclusions with regard to transplacental transmission of mRNA, which were published in 2022, have now been directly contradicted by the findings in this latest research reported on by AJOG. These two opposite and contradictory narratives, rendered within such a short period of time, shine a light on the fallacy of “scientific evidence-based medicine” as we know it today. As the government’s narrative changes, so changes the so-called “science.”
The Cart Went Before the Horse in Recommending COVID-19 Vaccines During Pregnancy
The latest research published by AJOG on Jan. 31, 2024, documenting the transplacental transmission of mRNA from the COVID-19 vaccines, demonstrates that the cart went before the horse in urging pregnant women to unhesitatingly take the COVID-19 vaccine. Yet, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) claimed (and is still claiming) that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations are safe and effective, recommending them for those who are pregnant, postpartum, breastfeeding, or planning on becoming pregnant.
Consider this: even the research study’s pro-vaccine mRNA authors – who at times seem to be speaking out of both sides of their mouth (perhaps in an effort to please their funding sources and journal editors) – admit that the mRNA vaccines pose plausible risks to the fetus. The authors state:
Although gene therapy, particularly mRNA-based treatments, shows promise, research on its perinatal delivery is still emerging. Prenatal therapy can be advantageous, because it offers early disease intervention and reduced immunogenicity. In experiments with pregnant rats, LNPs successfully delivered various mRNAs, including one potentially useful for treating fetal anemia. Although introducing mRNA to the fetus may potentially pose plausible risks, it may also have biologically plausible benefits.
Two assertions made by the study authors should give those pushing the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women concern. First, as the study authors essentially admit, a sobering fact remains – no one knows the long-term risks the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines might have on the offspring of pregnant mothers. Second, despite their obvious pro-vaccine position, the AJOG authors readily admit that the mRNA products are “gene therapy” – an assertion also previously debunked as false by US government federal money recipient and mouthpiece, The Associated Press.
A Warning About the Possibility of Cellular Uptake and Genomic Integration of mRNA
The research documenting transplacental transmission of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines recently published by AJOG is particularly concerning given that some have credibly hypothesized that mRNA can undergo reverse transcription and enter the cell nucleus. This could be particularly harmful to a fetus in light of the fact that mRNA has now been shown to reach the placental tissue with demonstrated bioactivity.
In light of such sobering information, how can ACOG continue to unhesitatingly recommend these mRNA gene therapy products to pregnant patients? ACOG’s website expressly claims – citing much older studies from 2019 and 2012 – that mRNA vaccines “do not enter the nucleus and do not alter human DNA in vaccine recipients.” Moreover, on an FAQ page, ACOG answers this question: “I have heard rumors about how the vaccines can affect my body. What is the truth?” with this response: “The vaccines do not affect your genes or DNA.” Yet, these assertions can no longer be definitively made in light of research documenting transplacental transmission of the mRNA products published by AJOG.
In February 2023 – some eleven months prior to the research published in AJOG – an article published in Med Hypotheses discussed the potential risks of mRNA-based “vaccine” therapies, and its conclusions were highly concerning. According to the authors, the mRNA entry into the cytoplasm of the cell has potential to then enter the nucleus of the cell, and could result in reverse transcription of full-length vaccine mRNA sequences into the DNA. Potentially, this could be a major safety concern, as synthetic mRNA-driven epigenetic and genomic modifications may occur. Intracellular accumulation of vaccine mRNA may trigger, among other problems, autoinflammatory and autoimmune conditions. These conditions can potentially lead to mutations in tumor-suppressing genes and sustained DNA damage. The increased risk of DNA damage is serious and may result in chronic autoinflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer in susceptible individuals.
An Ontogeny of Lies About the COVID-19 Vaccines
When we consider the litany of misrepresentations about the COVID-19 vaccines that have been perpetrated on the American public since their rollout in December 2020, concerns about reverse transcription and harm to the genome take on added significance. Misrepresentations have emanated not only from our government agencies, but also (and perhaps more concerningly), from a myriad of “trusted” sources – such as medical journals, hospitals, nurses, physicians, and government health administrators.
Consider the following examples, which include just a few of the misrepresentations told to the American public during the pandemic:
- Americans were initially told that nobody would be mandated to take the experimental COVID-19 injections – which were rebranded as “vaccines” to make them more palatable to the masses – including pregnant women, who were not included in the pre-clinical trials.
- Hydroxychloroquine was villainized as unsafe in a Lancet journal article by lead author Mehra in May 2020. Yet, the CDC has previously deemed it safe enough for pregnant women, nursing mothers, and children of all ages, as shown in a CDC directive prepared for malaria prevention for overseas travelers. Although the Lancet article was retracted 5 months after publication, the damage had been done – many people were more afraid of taking hydroxychloroquine than they were of contracting COVID-19.
- In a June 2021 article published in the New England Journal of Medicine, lead author Shimabukuro claimed that there were no safety concerns with the COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy, despite Pfizer’s post-marketing report documenting it to be the deadliest and most injurious medical intervention ever rolled out. Upon careful review, the study authors – all of whom had conflicts of interest as federal employees (including being part of the CDC V-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team) – either made gross errors or relied on statistical sleight-of-hand to reduce a miscarriage rate documented in the article as 82% to a more palatable (yet still too high) miscarriage rate of about 12%.
- In 2020 and 2021, the pharmaceutical-industrial complex claimed that the mRNA from the COVID-vaccines remained localized in the deltoid muscle of the arm. Concerns that the mRNA could potentially be reversed transcribed and incorporated permanently into the human genome were downplayed as misinformation. But alarmingly, lead author Aldén and colleagues demonstrated in Feb. of 2022 that this very phenomenon occurred in human liver cells in-vitro.
- Even more alarming is that two separate studies, published in 2022 and in 2023 by lead author Hanna, demonstrated that intact vaccine mRNA is excreted into human breast milk. These findings opened up the very real possibility that lipid nanoparticles could be distributed to every cell in the body, repackaged in the cytoplasm, resulting in mRNA excreted via liposomes or exosomes to be redistributed to potentially all other exocrine glands in the body. The vaccine mRNA could then be excreted by exhalation, sweat, cervical-vaginal secretions, and prostatic secretions. This, in addition to the spike protein, could explain the shedding phenomenon.
In summary, the evolution of mRNA vaccine “misinformation” from 2020, to what has been documented as true in 2024, has been astounding. Consider – just four years after Americans were falsely told the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines remains localized in the deltoid muscle, experts now credibly suggest that the vaccine mRNA could be permanently reverse-transcribed into the human genome. Research published by AJOG this year has demonstrated that mRNA from the COVID-19 vaccines can cross the placenta into fetal blood, and also enter placental tissue and produce spike protein. This brings heightened urgency to the question of whether COVID-19 mRNA is being reverse-transcribed into the human genome.
Other Concerns Raised by the Study – Are the mRNA Vaccines a Contributor to Maternal Morbidity and Mortality?
Also of great concern, the AJOG research study authors observed a “notably high signal” of vaccine mRNA in the decidua (which is the lining of the uterus closest to the fetus). Concentrated mRNA in decidual tissues can be translated into high concentrations of spike protein, which would plausibly contribute to a myriad of adverse effects on human reproductive function, including not only menstrual abnormalities (which has been previously documented) but also severe bleeding in pregnancy and in the post-partum period – a dangerous condition that can even lead to the death of the mother. When one considers that the CDC reports that maternal mortality has skyrocketed in 2021, given the notably high signal of vaccine mRNA in the decidua reported by the AJOG authors, the question of whether the mRNA vaccines have been a contributor must be examined.
Do mRNA Vaccines Risk Permanent Alteration of the Human Genome?
Finally, in February 2024, geneticist Mikolaj Raszek, PhD of Mergogenomics reviewed the first study suggesting the that vaccine mRNA could be permanently reversed transcribed into the human genome (DNA) in-vivo. While the evidence is not a smoking gun, his preliminary findings have potentially catastrophic implications if the vaccine mRNA is reverse transcribed into gametes’ genome (sperm and/or ova), thus potentially leading to permanent genomic alterations in future generations. With the rapid evolution of designer polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequencing, it is likely that Raszek’s preliminary data will be more thoroughly evaluated in the near future. If history is a teacher, given the ontogeny of lies told to the American public over the pandemic years, permanent integration of the vaccine mRNA into the human genome could be established, which may well be permanently incorporated into the genome of future generations.
Recommendations: A Call for Immediate Moratorium on the use of COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnant Women
This most recent research published in AJOG – documenting transplacental transmission of mRNA vaccine products and demonstrating intrauterine bioactivity, including spike protein expression – should cause ACOG, ABOG (American Board of ObGyn), and SMFM (Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine) to call for an immediate moratorium on the use of all COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. These genetic therapies must never be re-implemented in pregnancy until valid, independent, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials assess long-term risks. Until this moratorium takes place, informed consent should require pregnant patients to be advised of transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA prior to administering vaccination and also be advised that long-term risks to the fetus are unknown.
References:
1 Lin X, Botros B, Hanna M, Gurzenda E, Manzano De Mejia C, Chavez M, Hanna N, “Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses postvaccination”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2024), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.022
2 Wikipedia. (2024). “American Journal of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children.” https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?fulltext=1&search=American+Journal+of+Obstetrics+and+Diseases+of+Women+and+Children&title=Special%3ASearch&ns0=1
3 AFP Fact Check. Katarina Subašić, Aug. 18, 2021,“US doctor spreads false information about COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.” https://factcheck.afp.com/us-doctor-spreads-false-information-about-covid-19-mrna-vaccines#:~:text=In%20his%20speech%2C%20Cole%20claims%20that%20after%20an,in%20your%20blood%20and%20lands%20in%20multiple%20organs%E2%80%9D
4 The Associated Press (AP). Beatrice Dupuy. June 9, 2021, “Spike protein produced by vaccine not toxic.” https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-377989296609
5 USASPENDING.gov. (2024). “Recipient Profile: The Associated Press.” https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/7d4ac83c-018d-ab86-fbae-b9d399f8a4c2-C/latest
6 The Conversation. (2024). “Why do we get shots in the arm? It’s all about the muscle.” May 21, 2021. https://theconversation.com/why-do-we-get-shots-in-the-arm-its-all-about-the-muscle-161259
7 Prahl, M., Golan, Y., Cassidy, A.G. et al. Evaluation of transplacental transfer of mRNA vaccine products and functional antibodies during pregnancy and infancy. Nat Commun 13, 4422 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32188-1
8 Id.
9 USASPENDING.gov. (2024). “Recipient Profile: J.David Gladstone Institutes.” https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/2459e2e4-81d2-c365-157d-9590622d8532-C/latest
10 USASPENDING.gov. (2024). “Recipient Profile: Regents of the University of California, San Francisco.” https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/bb8d1cd4-e0ae-6348-a07c-04df6a112768-C/latest
11 University of California San Francisco (UCSF). (2024). Levi Gadye, Feb. 20, 2024, “UCSF Tops Public Universities in NIH Research Funding in 2023.” https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2024/02/427121/ucsf-tops-public-universities-nih-research-funding-2023.
12 The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2024). “COVID-19 Vaccines: Answers From Ob-Gyns.” https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/covid-19-vaccines-answers-from-ob-gyns#:~:text=None%20of%20the%20vaccines%20uses,getting%20pregnant%20in%20the%20future.
13 Lin X, Botros B, Hanna M, Gurzenda E, Manzano De Mejia C, Chavez M, Hanna N, “Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses postvaccination”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2024), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.022 (emphasis added)
14 USASPENDING.gov. (2024). “Recipient Profile: The Associated Press.” https://www.usaspending.gov/recipient/7d4ac83c-018d-ab86-fbae-b9d399f8a4c2-C/latest
15 The Associated Press (AP). Angelo Fichera. Dec. 23, 2022, “No, COVID-19 vaccines aren’t gene therapy.” https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-gene-therapy-806280914802
16 Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Bruno R. Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2023 Feb;171:111015. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015. Epub 2023 Jan 25. PMID: 36718314; PMCID: PMC9876036. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876036/
17 The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2024). “COVID-19 Vaccination Considerations for Obstetric-Gynecologic Care.” https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2020/12/covid-19-vaccination-considerations-for-obstetric-gynecologic-care
On this page, ACOG states, “…The mRNA vaccines are not live virus vaccines, nor do they use an adjuvant to enhance vaccine efficacy. These vaccines do not enter the nucleus and do not alter human DNA in vaccine recipients. As a result, mRNA vaccines cannot cause any genetic changes (CDC, Zhang 2019, Schlake 2012). Based on the mechanism of action of these vaccines and the demonstrated safety and efficacy in Phase II and Phase III clinical trials, it is expected that the safety and efficacy profile of the vaccine for pregnant individuals would be similar to that observed in nonpregnant individuals. …”
18 The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2024). “COVID-19 Vaccines: Answers From On-Gyns.” https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/covid-19-vaccines-answers-from-ob-gyns
19 Lin X, Botros B, Hanna M, Gurzenda E, Manzano De Mejia C, Chavez M, Hanna N, “Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses postvaccination”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2024), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.022
20 Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Bruno R. Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2023 Feb;171:111015. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2023.111015. Epub 2023 Jan 25. PMID: 36718314; PMCID: PMC9876036. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876036/
21 Id.
22 X (Formerly Twitter). Kevin McCarthy, Sept. 9, 2021 (quoting Biden claiming that he would not demand that vaccines be mandatory on Dec. 4, 2020). https://x.com/SpeakerMcCarthy/status/1436134804551045120?s=20
23 Mehra MR, Desai SS, Ruschitzka F, Patel AN. RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet. 2020 May 22:S0140-6736(20)31180-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6. Epub ahead of print. Retraction in: Lancet. 2020 Jun 5;:null. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 May 30;: Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Jul 18;396(10245):e2-e3. PMID: 32450107; PMCID: PMC7255293. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7255293/
24 Google. (2024). Pamphlet from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). “Medicines for the Prevention of Malaria While Traveling Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil TM).” https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/fsp/drugs/hydroxychloroquine.pdf
25 Tom T. Shimabukuro, M.D., Shin Y. Kim, M.P.H., Tanya R. Myers, Ph.D., Pedro L. Moro, M.D., Titilope Oduyebo, M.D., Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, M.D., Paige L. Marquez, M.S.P.H., Christine K. Olson, M.D., Ruiling Liu, Ph.D., Karen T. Chang, Ph.D., Sascha R. Ellington, Ph.D., Veronica K. Burkel, M.P.H., et al, for the CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons” N Engl J Med June 2021; 384:2273-2282 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104983. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983
26 Id.
27 The Conversation. (2024). “Why do we get shots in the arm? It’s all about the muscle.” May 21, 2021. https://theconversation.com/why-do-we-get-shots-in-the-arm-its-all-about-the-muscle-161259
28 Aldén M, Olofsson Falla F, Yang D, Barghouth M, Luan C, Rasmussen M, De Marinis Y. Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022 Feb 25;44(3):1115-1126. doi: 10.3390/cimb44030073. PMID: 35723296; PMCID: PMC8946961. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35723296/
29 Hanna N, Heffes-Doon A, Lin X, et al. Detection of messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccines in 185 human breast milk. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(12):1268-1270. doi: 186 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3581. 187 5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36156636/
30 Hanna N, De Mejia CM, Heffes-Doon A, et al. Biodistribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in 188 human breast milk. EBioMedicine. 2023;96:104800. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104800. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514401/
31 Lin X, Botros B, Hanna M, Gurzenda E, Manzano De Mejia C, Chavez M, Hanna N, “Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses postvaccination”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2024), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.022
32 Parotto T, Thorp JA, Hooker B, Mills PJ, Newman J, Murphy L, et al. COVID-19 and the surge in Decidual Cast Shedding. G Med Sci. 2022; 3(1): 107- 117. https://www.doi.org/10.46766/thegms.pubheal.22041401
33 Substack. (2024). Dr. Paul Alexander, Jan. 21, 2023, “Devastatingly higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage were observed in pregnant women after the third (3rd) COVID gene injection does (or 1st booster): needs to be confirmed with more study.” https://palexander.substack.com/p/devastatingly-higher-rates-of-postpartum
34 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2024). National Center for Health Statistics. Donna L. Hoyert, PhD, Division of Vital Statistics, “Maternal Mortality Rates in the United States, 2021,” March 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2021/maternal-mortality-rates-2021.htm
35 YouTube.(2024).”1st published evidence of gene therapy insertion into human DNA? (#125).” Mikolaj Raszek, PhD. January 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7dMTA-fD5Q; Apple Podcast. The Fact of the Matter. Interview with Dr, Mikolaj Raszek About Science, Covid, Vaccines and Immunity.
”The Fact of the Matter” Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/interview-with-dr-mikolaj-raszek-about-science-covid/id1493196712?i=1000571011971
